 |
 |
Home
> Reviews
> Monitor
|
|
 |
By : Robin Ang [Email Us]
Category : Monitor
Published By : Jimmy Tang, 22nd Nov 2002
|

Silver Award
|
|
Textual and Color Quality Checks
By utilizing "DisplayMate for Windows Multimedia with Motion Edition 2.0", we were able to gather some data on this monitor in terms of image quality. Take note that we used a Matrox G400 graphics card and its RGB analog output in order to get our results. Your mileage might differ according to your graphics card. However, since the G400 is amongst the best out there in terms of 2D and color reproduction, the tests should be indicative of the monitor's real world performance.
The AOC LM800 has a stated optimum resolution of 1280x1024 with a refresh rate of 75Hz. However, we found that setting the refresh rate to 60Hz has a significant improvement on brightness and clarity, so we proceeded to test it at 60Hz instead.
Additionally, we used a color temperature setting of 6500K before running through DisplayMate's "Tune Up" program for setting optimal contrast and brightness.
The AOC LM800 has a contrast ratio of 450:1 and a brightness rating of 200 cd/m2. The contrast ratio is reasonably high but we have seen better brightness ratings from other LCD panels.
DisplayMate Results
|
Circular Geometry, Cross Hatch and Dot
|
In the Circular
Geometry, Cross Hatch and Dot test, we can see that the circles are
flattened along the X-Axis (prolate). This is indicative of some minor
problems with the aspect ratio. The crosshatches are in most cases
perfectly displayed in that there are no obvious distortions in the lines
and dots. However, we can see bright fringes for particular color schemes
like "Blue on Red" and dark fringes for "Green on Magenta". This is
indicative of either color misregistration or misconvergence. However, it
is not as severe as it sounds, because other LCD panels have exhibited
similar characteristics. |
|
Stuck Pixel |
In the Stuck Pixel
test, we are able to discover one dead pixel. This is still considered
good bearing in mind that we have seen worst from other LCD panels. This
is a positive reflection on TPV whose factories are ISO9001 and ISO 14001
accredited for quality and environment. |
|
Screen Uniformity |
In
the Screen Uniformity test, we discovered a dim portion around
the periphery of the screen, for the background of all the colors in the
test. This is especially so for colors like white and cyan where the
problem persists in all variations of this test. This is less so for
colors like green, red, magenta and yellow. This is due to the difficulty
in backlighting the panel uniformly over the entire screen (resulting in
hot and cold spots that are brighter or dimmer than
average). |
|
Pixel Tracking and Timing Lock / Interlace
Flicker |
In the Pixel Tracking
and Timing Lock and Interlace Flicker tests, we discovered a
barely discernible flicker on the screen, which failed to be corrected by
the monitor’s auto-calibration. They are essentially beat patterns that
periodically modulate the intensity of the dithers or interlaced lines.
This might have been caused by electronic interference from nearby devices
or timing issues due to the use of the RGB analog input. |
|
Video Bandwidth Index |
We
are pleasantly surprised when we got a perfect score of 100 for the Video
Bandwidth Index. This indicates that high and low frequencies,
corresponding to broad and fine detail, are identically
reproduced. |
|
Gray-Scale Shifts |
In the Gray-Scale
Shifts test, the contrast in the shades of color can be clearly seen
but in cases where the contrast is only by a difference of one or two, it
is harder to make them out. This problem is especially acute for colors
like blue, red and magenta. We have seen similar results from other LCD
panels so this is probably due to an inherent weakness in LCD
technology. |
|
Gray-Scale Selectivity |
In
the Gray-Scale Selectivity test, we noticed a general trend where
the first 2 blocks (block 108, 110) and the last 2 blocks from the lowest
gray index to the highest gray index are either too bright or
indistinguishable from one another. We see this across all the colors of
the test. This is not surprising as LCD panels may produce pleasing images
but inaccurate in gray-scale rendering. |
|
White Level Saturation |
In
the White-Level Saturation test, we see a gradual shift in blocks
from the darkest to the lightest for all the colors of the test except for
some anomalies. Firstly, some of the blocks with an index of 233, 240 and
244 are too bright when it should have been darker. Some of the blocks are
indistinguishable from one another (block index 227, 229, 231, 233, for
example). This shows one of the disadvantages of LCD technology (the
bright-end of the LCD intensity scale is easily overloaded, which leads to
saturation and compression). |
|
Color Tracking |
Generally,
the AOC LM800 displays satisfactory performance in the Color
Tracking test, save for some anomalies. This includes a yellowish tint
to the brightest red / white (magenta looks a little too bright) and
certain color blocks are indistinguishable from one another (blocks 36,
40, 44, 48 and 52). |
|
64/256 Intensity Color Level Ramp and 256
Intensity Level Ramp / 64/128 Steps Gray Scale |
In
the 64/256 Intensity Color Level Ramp and 256 Intensity Level Ramp
tests, we can see a consistent trend where the dimmest and brightest end of the
gray scale shades are compressed. In the
64/128 Step Gray Scale test, we realized that there is significant
banding for the colors of white, green and magenta. This is an inherent
weakness of LCD panels so the AOC LM800 cannot be faulted
here. |
|
Reverse Video Check |
In
the Reverse Video Contrast check, we can see that black texts
look sharp except for some anomalies. We can see bright ridges for red and
magenta and dark ridges for cyan and green texts in the Black on
Gray box. We also noticed that the following color texts are not clear:
yellow and dark yellow. This is consistent with what we have discovered from
other LCD panel. Thus, the AOC LM800 is performing up to expectations
here. |
|
Color Combinations |
In
the Color Combinations test, we can see bright ridges for magenta,
red and yellow color combos and blue on green texts. Dark ridges can be found on
green color combos and cyan on magenta texts. Finally, cyan / green and white /
yellow color combos texts are not clear. However, comparatively speaking the
LM800 actually performs better than some panels. |
|
Scaled Font |
The
AOC LM800 performs up to expectations in the Scaled Font test.
The smallest font that can be discerned is of size 9 pixels and 6.8 points
for both Arial and Times New Roman fonts at a resolution of 1280 x
1024. |
|
Color
Saturation / High Contrast Streaking / Streaking and Ghosting
/ Color Streaking / Screen Regulation / Moiré
Montage |
The
AOC LM800, like other good quality LCD panels performs well in the
following tests: Color Saturation, High Contrast Streaking, Streaking
and Ghosting, Color Streaking, Screen Regulation and finally
Moiré Montage tests. This shows that the monitor should perform
relatively well in games or video materials, where there is a rapid
sequence of image changes. Additionally, the LCD should have no problem
displaying bars, charts and titles, commonly found in office
documents. | | | |